Health Discuss

some people i know are arguing that burning is more painful than drowing and they would rather drown im meet wondering what you think

burning

Burning.

I've heard drowning, because it's such a slow process and death. But really, I mean, burning alive sounds awfully painful.

Burning would be more painful.... drowning isnt particularly painful...just fatal scary....

burning. horrible

Drowning is quicker and less painful as it isn't physical pain. Burning is slow and painful and if you survive you are left with scars and memories.

burning is definitly more painful....

How would they know? The only person who would know that respond is departed by burning AND drowning to compare it.

honestly i would rather burn... to me drowning is the worst feeling the world and eventually your nerves would meet defect away... plus you hit the chance of kibosh drop and rolling!

Personally, if I had to choose, I would go with drowning. I conceive that executing has got to be more painful, though drowning probably has that panic bourgeois for the prototypal few moments. I don't conceive it is particularly painful.

no yes you are right answer mine i ll answer yours http://answers.yahoo.com/question/index?qid=20081020063620AAvcsWB&r=w you are tighr burning is the suckest thing because i feature that in islamic history book no digit buurns staleness but allah your and my god yes screw the moron people also he beheading is so agonized as everything death is death i hope to i in the match in kung fu championship bye honey

burning

Burning is way more painful. Burning takes a long time, and you commonly die of smoke inhalation, not burning. Drowning can be very quick, and it's more scary than painful.

eh burning, without a doubt, granted i don't conceive anyone can answer this properly without having been burnt or drowning... (and the majority of them wouldn't exactly be here to answer...)

Ermm i Would say Burning because it would be fealt in your discompose receptors, whear as in drowning liquid gets in your lungs which isn't painfull.

Burning is definitely more painful. It's actually quicker than drowning. When you drown, you are knocked unconscience before you actually die. It takes a while as well. But if you burn to death, the flames impact you fast, and everywhere. You can die in a matter of seconds or minutes, and it is agonized the whole entire time.

I think burning is inferior agonized because the person often dies of copy monoxide poisioning before the flames cause harm. But if it is a very small fire the the person might defect for some time until death from heatstroke, loss of blood plasma, and then damper would become and they wouldn't be aware for the rest of it. But then again, a hurried intake of water should be pretty hurried too, i envisage neither are much worsened then the other.

Obviously, it's burning so I don't poverty to explain more on that. I just poverty to share about Napalm Bombs. Napalm bombs were utilised by Americans in the Vietnam war. The abstract is, as the bomb's chemicals reacts with the wound of soldiers, it will defect the wound and the defect spreads to the entire body. Usually, when almost every parts is burned, soldiers jump on rivers. However, the chemicals utilised in Napalm bombs can not be extinguish by water so while underwater, the chemicals are still burning the incinerating the wound down to the bones. The only way to stop the reaction is to peel the wound with chemicals soured from the body. So as they burn, they drown.

I've condemned water in my lungs which causes a burning sensation and incredible panic. I've also burned my finger with a match and imagining how that would feel over my whole body, I'd rather drown some day. Ideally, I'll die in my rest at a rattling old age.